facebook youtube twitter rss

Ghost Tree R.I.P

NOAA makes its decision on the Monterey Bay Marine Sanctuary; Maverick’s will remain a “seasonal” PWC zone
By Evan Slater

We all saw this coming sooner or later. But as of February 2009, it’s official: the days of snagging 60-foot XXL contenders at Ghost Tree or whipping into the tube of your life at Moss Landing are over. In a decision to be announced later this week, officials at the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (MBNMS) and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) have closed a loophole in the laws governing the use of personalized watercraft in the Sanctuary. Translation: Jet Ski dudes are now barred everywhere from Monterey to Half Moon Bay. This means that under no circumstances or swell conditions can a surfer use a PWC to ride the waves at Ghost Tree – the site of a number of Billabong XXL contenders in the past few years.

In the same token, NOAA and officials at the MBNMS realize the importance of PWCs in XXL surf, which is why they have created a seasonal fifth “MPWC” operating zone at Maverick’s. When there is a NOAA-issued high-surf advisory, surfers will be allowed to use PWCs at the world-renowned big wave. The Surfrider Foundation, who has been involved in this ongoing debate for nearly a decade, feels this is the best compromise possible considering the passionate viewpoints from all parties. “This wasn’t a, ‘We’ll give you Ghost Tree if you give us Maverick’s thing,’” says Surfrider’s Matt McClain. “It was more about looking at where the breaks were located and what leaves the lightest footprint.”

Surfrider realizes this is one of the few issues where it might not be advocating for all surfers. But it’s an environmental organization first and foremost – and it feels this is perfect example of a little give and take in the interest of preserving our oceans. “We realize this isn’t going to go over well with everyone,” says McClain. “But there are legitimate arguments on both sides and we feel this is a great first step.”

Peter Mel, one of the best big-wave surfers of all time and one of the more vocal surfers involved in this decision, still isn’t sure how he feels about it. “Is it surprising? Not at all,” he says. “From our very first discussions, the writing was on the wall that NOAA wanted to go this direction. We knew they were going to probably give us Maverick’s and we knew Moss Landing and Ghost Tree were probably going to be shut down. I understand the environmental arguments, but there’s also a real safety concern. And trust me, when Ghost Tree is going off, guys will find ways to tow it. It might not be the safest way, but they’ll be out there on whatever works. Zodiacs, George Greenough boats, you name it. I’m definitely not going that route, but it will happen.”

Both Mel and McClain like the idea of this being an ongoing process. Where perhaps, in time, a permitting system is implemented where limited Skis can be used within the sanctuary on high-surf advisory days. But that, according to McClain, will be up to the tow-in community. Mel thought they were going in that direction a couple of years ago, but felt the tow community wasn’t organized and persistent enough to make it happen. As the sport grows, that could change in time. “My only concern now, though,” says Mel. “Is that up here at least, the only time you can learn to tow surf is when the surf is 20 feet. That could be a problem.”

No more Santa Cruz tow-ats?
Copyright ©2009 SOURCE INTERLINK MEDIA™. All rights reserved.

Regardless, it’s yet another step in the ongoing evolution of surfers and their PWCs. As always, the best will find a way to adapt and the pretenders will find another stretch of coast to rev their engines or take up wakeboarding. “To be honest,” says Mel, “I’ve been focusing most of my effort on the paddle realm anyway. We’ve reached the limits of tow surfing – now it’s just up to the ocean to keep pushing that sport along. But paddle surfing? Watching guys like Kohl Christenson and Nathan Fletcher last year at Maverick’s inspired me. That’s where there are still some serious barriers to be broken.”

Reader Comments 
Posted Mon Nov17, 2008, 3:32 PM — By Greg
wow, that sucks but as surfers you gotta think about the environment.
Posted Mon Nov17, 2008, 3:38 PM — By oso rojo
no more tow-ats? that is a good thing. more empahsis on paddling in? that is a good thing. more emphasis on other big wave breaks and not Ghost Tree? that is a good thing. compromise is always a tough pill to swallow. but the environmental benefits outweigh the personal enjoyment and surf-industry desires on this one.
Posted Mon Nov17, 2008, 3:39 PM — By jon
bummer for the big tow-ins....but sleds are for sucks! time to see who can paddle in the heaviest.
Posted Mon Nov17, 2008, 3:50 PM — By jim
makes sense to me! i think the right decision was reached.
Posted Mon Nov17, 2008, 3:53 PM — By dano
Ah!Bummer! I was hoping for a greater carbon footprint so we could warm the Monterey Bay up a little. I guess I'll just have to do my part and continue to drive an SUV. Get over yourselves!
Posted Mon Nov17, 2008, 3:56 PM — By LYNDA MOORE DOUCETTE
TO ALL WHO LOVE BIG SURF WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO GORTEZ BANK YOU CAN STILL BE PULLED IN BY JET SKI AND RIDE THE BIG ONE! GO FOR IT FLAME WOULD LOVE IT FLAMES SISTER LYNDA
Posted Mon Nov17, 2008, 3:59 PM — By Mike H
Eco-Nazi's WIN again!!!!!
Posted Mon Nov17, 2008, 4:14 PM — By still kicking
Eco Nazi? c'mon, get real...it is only one break and less than a dozen probably surf it...
Posted Mon Nov17, 2008, 4:17 PM — By Dan
Well it's not the end of the world, but on the other hand I don't see how tow-in surfers have anything to do with any sort of carbon footprint or environmental impact on the bay. Let's get back to reality and deal with the mega corporations spewing out the real toxins, not 5 guys towing into some big surf a couple times a year. That is just absurd.
Posted Mon Nov17, 2008, 4:17 PM — By derekjmd
environmental issues aside.. if you can't paddle yourself out to where you need to be.. then maybe you should not be surfing there.
Posted Mon Nov17, 2008, 4:26 PM — By Jason N
From Hawaii.......old school baby. Paddle, drop in and hold your balls. Ban da skis:)
Posted Mon Nov17, 2008, 4:49 PM — By drewski
man, i just bought a new ski, i've been practicing at rincon all summer!
Posted Mon Nov17, 2008, 5:46 PM — By Andy
I always looked at tow-in surfing as an extreme sport not real surfing. True surfing is me, my board and the ocean. If they banned all PWC I would be happy. Only effect on me would be that I don't get watch other people ride monster waves on DVDs and TV. Less TV is a good thing too....
Posted Mon Nov17, 2008, 5:50 PM — By tcblazn
It sucks that no one seems to understand science. Our planet takes 26,000 years to travel around the sun. We are on a cycle where our planet is slowly passing the closest to the sun we have been for at least 13,000 years if not 26,000 years. This means that everything happening is going to happen even if we left the planet and had never been here. You see the planet is getting ready to morph in away. The magnetic poles are shifting. This means that the ice caps must melt in order for the shift to take place. That means a rise in our temps, a rise in water level, more storms, more earthquakes, more natural disasters. While man is screwing up things like coral reefs(a great source of O2)alot of what we see is a normal process. Call it evolution, if we are to worry let's stop worrying about things we cannot change. We should be conserned about man's survival. We have all heard the story of Noah and his Arc. research it youself.
Posted Mon Nov17, 2008, 6:30 PM — By griz
that is a bummer, but maybe this will inspire someone the likes of garrett lisi to develop a completely electric jet ski?!?
Posted Mon Nov17, 2008, 7:00 PM — By Rat
Can someone please explain to me what the environmental impacts are. They seem like snowmobile haters in wildernes snow melts no tracks, what impact? If I cant take my pwc to GT I will take it somewhere else increaseing the impact at Mavs. Who does that help? Haters suck and so do nature nazis.
Posted Mon Nov17, 2008, 7:16 PM — By sammy
tcblazn nailed it. Al Gore and gang scared everyone to death that we were causing global warming. BS. The earth has natural warming and cooling periods. Nothing we do will hinder those periods. While of course we need to be responsible earth citizens and pick up trash, etc, do you really think a few tows in Monterey will actually harm the ocean???!!! Get real. You'd have to ban all boats in the ocean to at least be consistent. Prevent another Exxon Valdez and we'll be fine. Even that was all cleaned up by mother ocean.
Posted Mon Nov17, 2008, 7:25 PM — By Sarah
I think that the right thing was done here. I mean common if we're essentially making the ocean sick, we should (as surfers) stop whatevers causing it!! And plus padding gives you great arm muscles!!
Posted Mon Nov17, 2008, 7:36 PM — By Paul
While the original issue regarding PWC use in the sanctuary centered around them being gross polluters, the advent of modern 4-stroke engines made this point moot. The current concern regardng PWC use is centered around their impacts upon bird and marine life within the sanctuary (based on their operating at high speeds with great agility). Given the amount of seals, sea otters and other wildlife that congregrate within the Montery Bay sanctuary, I think this is a good decision.
Posted Mon Nov17, 2008, 7:43 PM — By Troy
This is ridiculous! The pwc activity in this area has little to no harm on the marine life! The amount of days the swell even gets big enough to tow in at this spot would never have an impact on any marine life in this area! This type of law baffles me! Its just one more wave knocked off our list. How many more will they take. Trestles is next, get ready for that one!
Posted Mon Nov17, 2008, 7:49 PM — By percy
Screw the environmentalists! I surfed carmel on saturday and saw about 8 fishing boats all at pescadero point. You mean to tell me that 5 or 6 pwcs a few times a year can do more damage than these guys do every single day? Give me a break
Posted Mon Nov17, 2008, 8:54 PM — By Brian
This is just the beginning. Tow surfing is in its infancy compared to land sports. There is a place in sports for tow surfing. I think that its best and highest use is when the waves are way beyond paddling into. "Ghost Tree", or as I have known it since the seventies Pescadero Point, will be ridden to 100 feet some day. Safety is so important here folks. I want to see the dads come home to there kids after riding giants. Lets not get stupid and force things with lame alternate watercraft just because were told no jet skis right now. It will get worked out soon if effort is applied to permitting use on the big days. For now paddle paddle paddle. Its good for you. See you out there over the ledge.
Posted Mon Nov17, 2008, 9:31 PM — By Keith
FREE GHOST TREE.. FREE SURF, FREE COUNTRY, FREE SOUL... I quess Surfrider foundation has finally jumped the shark, maybe now they can join hands with those Greenpece idiots. If these idiot's had there way we would all have to buy a license to surf next. OB SOUL
Posted Mon Nov17, 2008, 9:47 PM — By vince
if you are worried about the environment get rid of your surfboard wetsuit car computer tv vcr
Posted Mon Nov17, 2008, 10:28 PM — By I know better...
Here's their real goal. NO ONE ALLOWED in the MBNMS except the NOAA "caretakers". Mark my words, these Marine Sanctuaries are becoming the private sanctuaries of the elite science community. Surfing will be banned next in the whole bay because of some stupid endanger sand flea or something. Who's got the paddle-in hellman's back when their are no ski's around? Don't worry about the damned seals, they are all pilled up like wards of the state down in the marina. No jet-ski will be running them over as the seals sink another boat in the marina. Those Ghost Tree guys have ABSOLUTELY ZERO negative impart on the environment. It's all the research vessels spewing diesel that should be banned. What ever happened to California's natural resources being "The People's" Now it all only belongs to the Elite Environmentalist. Get it while you can folks... Too many worthless rules!
Posted Tue Nov18, 2008, 12:18 AM — By Less rights than yesterday.
Don't you think it's cool that Surfrider has invited the Federal government to regulate surfing? No more donations from me.
Posted Tue Nov18, 2008, 1:27 AM — By you are all poser fags
you guys are all fucking homos.how many of you even tow? none i'll bet. me personally, i'm STOKED that all those stupid tow-at fags will be banned from Moss. all those guys do is barge in blast these lame unmakable airs so they can get their pictures in the magazines. towing in to anything but massive surf is lame.
Posted Tue Nov18, 2008, 3:11 AM — By miksurf
I am an environmentalist, but let's get real. The impact of the incredibly small amount of days of PWC's at Ghost Trees is practically zero. The only reason tow surfing got axed was the big money Republican enclave known as Pacific Grove and Carmel. The wealthy do not want their golf game disturbed—even if it is by some of the most courageous athletes in history. The fact that this is even an issue is lame, and Surfrider, and all of the people who negotiated this with the nerds at NOAA are lame as well. There are exceptions to every wise rule, and letting these big wave events into California culture is a justifiable exception. Keep them out of Moss, but they make Ghost Tree and Mavericks safe at over 30 ft. A stupid decision, and Surfer should make that clear. If Carmel can handle Laguna Seca, it can handle a few days a year when the surf is mythologically huge, and PWC's are the only reasonable way to do it.
Posted Tue Nov18, 2008, 5:50 AM — By John
I know better has it right. My friend was a caretaker working for the Nature Conservency and other environmental organizations. He quit after he found out their ultimate goal is no public acess. Only the leaders and their friends get to enjoy the protectd areas, of course these inspection trips are paid for by your donations. They have done it to the northwestern Hawaiian islands,parts of Maui, Kaena Point, and Mt Kaala on Oahu.
Posted Tue Nov18, 2008, 5:56 AM — By abs
well i have never tried tow surfing, and every time i see a PWC in the water where i surf, i curse them and really hate them, they make the water stink, and when you come to surf and relax you have to hear them making noise and nasty smells. HOWEVER, looking at places like GT, i dont think they shouldnt be in the water, i mean come on its not that the ocean gives huge surf every day, and if there is a small bunch of surfers that dare to surf those waves, why make it harder on them. I say ban all PWC where it affect the swimmers, surfers and is done on a daily basis close to the beach and really has a bad effect, not ban such asmall group of surfers that their days are limited, and the effct can not be felt.. hope for those surfers that they will have the power to overcome this ban and continue to push the level of surfing, and make the ban on all other small surf beaches, NO MORE PWC AT YOUR LOCAL BREAK :) !!!!!
Posted Tue Nov18, 2008, 7:58 AM — By sup
who is up for paddling into Ghost Trees
Posted Tue Nov18, 2008, 9:06 AM — By Matt
"Here's their real goal. NO ONE ALLOWED in the MBNMS except the NOAA "caretakers". Mark my words, these Marine Sanctuaries are becoming the private sanctuaries of the elite science community." - I agree. Look at the recent "bailout bill" (banker takeover bill) and do something radical that no one dares to do: READ IT! you will see that there is already a provision in the works for paying your carbon tax directly to the private banks that are looting our treasury and forming a world gov't. This will be used to regulate every facet of your life, tax you on breathing LITERALLY when you are apportioned CO2 individually. Lookout for the new environmental cops that will be federal. All environmental bs used to control us, not protect the environment.
Posted Tue Nov18, 2008, 9:08 AM — By Warwick Heny
well all I live in South Africa so maybe I do not know the whole story but some of the comments make sense to me. scientists boats and fishing boats cause more damage period. A few days a year on PWC don't do much damage ( and no I do not own one ). its true, the folk in charge want to restrict access at taxpayers expense so they can enjoy it themselves.but then again the USA is full of stupid legislation like the Ozzies too, heck you cant even light a wood fire barbeque, you gotta have gas ! Come to South Africa, its still wild man...www.southafrica.net
Posted Tue Nov18, 2008, 11:45 AM — By nomis76 ON THE EAST
DOES ANYONE THINK THAT THE FEW SKIS TOWING HAS THE IMPACT COMPARED TO OPENING DAY OF SALMON SEASON @ MONTEREY, MOSS,SANTA CRUZ,OR HALF MOON BAY HARBORS? AND THEY ARE ALL PROPELLERS THAT HAPPEN TO CHOP UP ANYTHING THEY RUN OVER. AND THATS ONLY ONE DAY. ONE DAY????
Posted Tue Nov18, 2008, 2:53 PM — By OBSOUL
I think enviromental nazi groups kill it for everyone. Surfers are allways looking out for the Ocean and we don't need these nonprofit Eco groups, yes you SurfRider, to ride our wave looking for frre money and cooperate help. Get a real job like the rest of us. Save a surfer not some endanger sand flea.. As of today we 17 people who will no longer be donating to these idioys anymore.
Posted Tue Nov18, 2008, 3:27 PM — By a_ding
Permit System First of all hey tcblazn, Dude, you said, "Our planet takes 26,000 years to travel around the sun." WTF? Our planet goes around the sun once a year. N-E Ways..... Here are my two cents: Tow-in folks need to get organized and push harder for a permit system where the fees go back in to conservation efforts. I'm sure that PWC operators and their sponsers will be happy to pay a fee to get their big shots and vids instead of paying fines. NOAA may not know what they are getting in to, but how will they enforce a bunch of amped out pros when it's firing? Block the boat ramps when it's huge? I don't think so...they'll just find another way to get thier skis in the water and they'll get fined when they reach shore.
Posted Tue Nov18, 2008, 4:44 PM — By Mike H
I like the Jason from Hawaii dude makin judgement calls on what happens in the Monterey bay....smoke some more wowie and STFU. My bro-in law is @ Jaws, Peahi local, and thinks PWC's are the only way you can effectively surf it!!! Sooo,,keep surfin 2' WakiWaki waves and leave the "Man Waves" alone and you surf w/ your Keiki waves!!!! The ocean is OUR playground and our responsibilty to protect......Balance with all creatures involved is the key!!!!
Posted Tue Nov18, 2008, 6:07 PM — By miksurf
CORRECTION: i do not include the tow in surfers in my comments that those involved in the negotiations got it way wrong. Peter Mel, etc.are wise, level-headed, and fearless. I am sure their input helped in every way possible towards the right decision, but to no avail. PWC's are pests in general in terms of noise, but come on, a few days a year is tolerable considering the greatness of the adventure. The complaining residents need to get down there and watch... It is a plus.
Posted Tue Nov18, 2008, 7:24 PM — By Phnud
While only a few may surf these breaks at the moment, it's only a matter of time until it gets as packed as Teahupo when it's firing. It won't only be the PWCs and the surfers, it'll be support boats, the media and a bunch of people rubber necking. By then, the environmental impact will be much greater and it'll be a lot harder to put a ban in place. As for OBSOUL's sand flea,where do you draw the line, mate? A sand flea today, a spotted frog tomorrow, all of a sudden the bottom level of a food chain is rooted and for what, so we can get our jollys? Oh, Sammy? With an opinion like that, I guess you've done the research to back up your argument? And I mean YOU, not just read it on www.rightwingidiot.com. One last thing, spare us the fatuous comments about salmon fishing, giving up surfboards, computers etc. etc. They're just plain silly.
Posted Tue Nov18, 2008, 8:07 PM — By Tyler Pardee
When referring to environmental impact surfers taking out PWCs on a few days/year is microscopic when compared to the impact that a giant golf course eroding foreign chemicals by the truckload into the ocean every year further compounded by the amount that oceanfront homes adds to the problem. It may be a step in the right direction, but a misdirected one.
Posted Wed Nov19, 2008, 12:21 AM — By tower
I tow at moss, up north, wherever is good. I always stay away from paddel surfers. I never have come close and disturbed any sea life. There is no prop like a boat. I cannot believe you can go and take all kinds of fish from the sea, and they are not banned too. Ban everything, cars, walking.. This shit is lame. I get fat barrels all the time people could never get paddeling at moss. Quit the crying. All you happy paddel people are going to get what you want and where u paddle will be more crowded with all the people who were down the way towin. They are not loud and don't stink, they are 4 stroke engines. There is a thousand better ways to spend resorces to improve pollution and wildlife preservation. Piss off all you who helped pass this law. One last comment I shattered my elbow and have an elbow replacement. It is really hard and bad on my elbow with all the paddeling and having to get up. I am done after an hour my elbow is in too much pain. Towing was the only way I could get out there and ride.th
Posted Wed Nov19, 2008, 1:36 AM — By Brad
tower, you are lame and you cant spell. wwwwaaaahhh, I hurt my elbow and cant paddle... waaahhh, it hurts.. All you PWC owners who are complaining about this can suck my balls and go to hell. Either you are true hellmen and wont let the man stop you from doing whatever the hell you want, or you are posers who need horsepower to compensate for your weak-ass arms and little dicks. There are big waves all over this coast waiting to be PWC'd so go get em.
Posted Wed Nov19, 2008, 2:04 AM — By tower
Brad u need to suck some balls kook, show up at the dock and we can talk idiot. You are the baby!! Get a bottle.
Posted Wed Nov19, 2008, 4:00 AM — By Phnud
Hey Tower, it's paddling, not paddeling. And maybe ask the sea life if it feels disturbed. I doubt that you're in any position, on a stinking, whining PWC, to know WTF the sea life thinks or feels. Unless maybe you're of a similar cell structure to, say, a blue bottle, in which case you'd be considered and expert witness.
Posted Wed Nov19, 2008, 11:12 AM — By nate
Hey thanks for being a good spell checker, you people need to wake up and try to do something worth while.
Posted Wed Nov19, 2008, 6:12 PM — By Central Coaster
The real issue is the state eroding our rights. Martial law in war,patriot act,environmental mitigation...they are very similar ways to limit our freedoms.I use my PWC as a boat like a mariner!Access surfing where feet or wheels cannot go.The city-centric liberals and environmentalists have hijacked the country living and open space standard. So I say to all of you who think that the MBNMS is Monterey Bay and Santa Cruz I urge you to be educated that it goes south to Cambria. Let me also share with you that we in the south are not city slickers, and I am beginning to deeply resent being dictated to by a bunch of citizens of a concrete jungle that is a region away from me and my home.You city people keep up all this hype to save the environment while you live in polluted, trash infested, craphole urban areas that have a way larger polution footprint than the likely country dwellers that you have overwhelmed with your save the world votes.For those livin' country,it is always bad when town runs country.Bumm
Posted Wed Nov19, 2008, 8:11 PM — By Phnud
No worries, Nate. This is all I've got going on in my life, please don't ask me to give it up. Hey Central Coaster, you a member of the NRL as well?
Posted Wed Nov19, 2008, 8:58 PM — By Jacqueline C.
Bummer! Was hoping to get to that level after having my third baby! Always wanted to try tow-in there! Will miss watching the surfers on my layovers there! Just hope they'll be safe when other means will be used.
Posted Wed Nov19, 2008, 10:33 PM — By Debbie Do Right
Well, there is always Hawaii! Try wait for Jaws, brah.........
Posted Thu Nov20, 2008, 12:43 PM — By OBSOUL
Another inland transplant who joined surfrider or got a subscription to Surfer mag and now calls himself a "surfer". Yea you Pud I mean Phnud. I live and surf this area and have ridden large waves around the world, I have also lost two goods friends and world class big wave chargers because of a lack for safety equipment. Now that we have the right equipment you freaks want to stop us. How about cracking down on the Alcoholics and idiot's that feel there dog can shit at the beach leave it. Dog shit is a hell of alot worse then a couple of ski's. All yea, hey Pud I am a Marine biologist and believe I do know alittle bit about the subject. Ps. would love to take you out this winter in 30' surf if you can handle it.
Posted Fri Nov21, 2008, 7:58 PM — By Brad
Central Coaster, imagine a time in the future of your fledgling sport, when all sorts of Jacqueline Cs are puttering around the central coast on their new PWCs looking for surf. The proponents of the ban feel that it really only adversely affects a few PWC users (in their short-term pursuit of happiness), while the long-lasting benefits will be enjoyed by many, many more. Still, even though I see myself as a life long paddle-only surfer and ocean lover, I agree that the whole idea of a ban seems a bit fascist and probably un-necessary. Some sort of regulation is probably in order, but agreed that this isnt the best solution. Seems obvious that having a few small controlled PWC access areas near the good tow waves would be OK for the environment. Above the point is well made that PWCs are a drop in the bucket compared to all the other blatant raping of the ocean that goes on daily. Just dont go ripping all over the kelp beds on glassy summer days, etc...
Posted Sat Nov22, 2008, 12:19 AM — By tower
Brad, nice a little open minded thinking. Basically pwc cannot go in kelp to well, gets sucked into the impeller. We are surfers first off and have been doing it our whole lives...most of us. We love and respect the ocean as much if not more than others.
Posted Sat Nov22, 2008, 8:49 PM — By PHOTO MATT
surfin all my life been around world boat trips 51 yrs young still chargin and shootin pro photos bought a sled to shoot mavs 2008 insane decided to tow been playin around at moss igot 4 months to hit it.If its charginn big waves motor or no motor at least we could tell our next generation of surfers stories of pebble beaches 19th whole ghost trees and every break in our over famous over rateted marine santurary were great whites eat us i dont get it politics whers my 6-4 pintail aloha

Add Comment
Name (Required):
Email (Required, will not be shown to public):
Comment (Required, max chars: 1024):
You have characters left.
    

 

 


Subscribe to Surfing Magazine Here...

THE BEST WAVES!
THE BEST SURFERS!
THE BEST PHOTOS!

AND NOW THE BEST DEAL: SUBSCRIBE TODAY AND GET 1 YEAR OF SURFING MAGAZINE FOR ONLY $12.00!

Take advantage of this special offer-act now!

GIVE A GIFT

 


Email:
First Name:
Last Name:
Address Line 1:
Address Line 2:
City:
State: Zip:
Select a payment option:
Charge my credit card
Bill me later
Do you have a promotional coupon code?
Enter Code:
Please send me special offers and exclusive promotions from Surfing's premiere partners.
 

Subscribe to Surfing Magazine Subscribe to Surfing Magazine - Print Edition Sign up for our Newsletter Subscribe to Surfing Magazine - Digital Edition
© 2009 Source Interlink Media. All Rights Reserved